The institute
How we teach, and why this way
A programme is judged on three things: what is taught, how you verify it was learned, and who answers for it. Here are our three answers, with what makes each of them true.
What is taught, and where it comes from
The content base is published in detail, field by field and level by level. It runs deepest where the regional market asks for it — industrial safety first — and opens elsewhere at the pace of demand. We display both distributions rather than an average, because it is the gap between them that tells you what you will actually find.
- modules in the base
- 444
- fields covered
- 13
- modules classified by level
- 434
- modules at advanced level
- 8
Expert level is produced on demand, against a stated need: that is the format that suits it.
How content is produced
Through a tooled chain, then checked and signed off by a named person who answers for it. We publish that chain in full: production whose workings are described can be discussed, corrected and improved — which silent production allows nobody to do.
- 01
Scoping the need
One trade, one entry level, one expected outcome. Nothing starts until the target skill is stated as a verifiable action verb.
- 02
Production
Learning sequence, materials, exercises, assessments. The step that used to take months and now takes weeks.
- 03
Quality control
Accuracy, currency, consistency with the stated objective. Content failing the check goes back to production, not online.
- 04
Human sign-off
A named academic lead takes responsibility and publishes. This step is never automated — it is the only guarantee that counts.
- 05
Publication and freeze
The course is frozen for the duration of the session. Two learners in the same cohort must have received exactly the same teaching.
The three rules that hold the chain together
A chain that produces fast must be held by firm rules. These three are the condition for speed to remain an advantage, and they are public so that you can hold us to them.
A human always publishes
The chain produces a draft; it never publishes on its own. An identified academic lead approves every publication and answers for it.
The freeze rule
A course does not change during its session. Altering content under a running cohort would break equal treatment between learners — an invisible risk, and the most serious one.
No agent is a teacher
A credential is a legal act. The chain produces, the human guarantees: no automated system is counted in the faculty, and none alone issues a decision that shapes a learner's path.
How we verify it was learned
Through submitted, marked work, with an identity check on every certifying assessment. The four rules below are stated before you begin and hold for the whole programme.
- Pass threshold stated before you begin, and held to the end
- Number of attempts known in advance, and identical across the cohort
- Named feedback on what remains to be worked on, alongside the mark
- Award carrying a public verification link, openable without an account
What the tutor expects of you
The tutor works continuously, at any hour, on the content of the programme you are taking. Its design rests on four principles, and they are what give it worth: because it makes you search, the award you obtain means something to an employer.
It does not give assessment answers
It rephrases, offers an example, asks a question that moves things forward. A learner handed the solution learns nothing — and the resulting certificate would be worthless.
It does not leave the course
It is anchored in the content of the course being taken, not plugged into the open web. That makes it less talkative, and far more reliable on what is actually taught.
It neither marks nor decides
No certifying mark, no admission, no exclusion. Those acts remain reserved to people, who sign them and answer for them.
It does not report your exchanges
Neither to a parent nor to an employer. A learner who knows they are constantly watched stops daring to be wrong, and so stops learning.
Continue
- VisionTalent that wants to qualify without leaving home, employers hiring for precise skills: a single equation, solved in one place. IHETC is built to hold it, and this page says exactly how.
- Teaching methodAn hour of teaching at IHETC has a precise shape, and it is the same across every programme. Knowing it before you enrol tells you what you will do with your time, week after week.
- GovernanceAn institution that names its officers commits someone. Here is who carries the project, which decisions belong to people, and the exact route a complaint follows.
- Academic governanceDecisions touching programmes and awards are taken in council, on a written agenda and by vote. Here is what the academic council settles, how it sits, and what follows from each of its meetings.
- Academic teamFour roles surround every programme, and each carries a written responsibility. Knowing who designs, who marks and who follows you tells you whom to contact, from day one.
- QualityTeaching quality is proved by the circuit that produces it and by the reviews that correct it. Here are both, with their cadence, their checkpoints and what every report triggers.
- Status and authorisationsIHETC is a private higher education institution, authorised by order of the ministry responsible for higher education and approved as a vocational training centre. Here are both frameworks, what they permit, and how to check them.
- Service commitmentsA commitment without a timeframe stays an intention. Here are ours: quantified, enforceable and identical for every enrolled learner, whatever the programme and whatever the fee paid.
- Ethics and use of AITooling produces fast, a person guarantees. This page says precisely where the tool operates, where the decision belongs to someone, and what you can expect from it during your programme.
- Data protectionA remote institution holds information about your path. Here is what it holds, what each item is for, how long it lives, and the six actions you can take yourself at any time.
- AccessibilityAccessibility is decided on concrete details: the weight of a page, the size of a text, content that opens without a network, a pace that works alongside a job. Here is how each of those points is handled.
- Applied researchResearch here carries an obligation to deliver: every project ends in a teachable module, a usable framework or a delivered tool. Here are the priorities, the circuit and the application grounds.
- International outlookAn award travels provided it is documented the way an equivalence office expects. Here is what every IHETC file contains, what a programme allows from another country, and how it can all be checked.
- Institutional partnershipsA school, an administration or a company working with us obtains a programme, a calendar and defensible records. Here are the four possible forms, what each covers, and how an agreement is put in place.
- SustainabilityIHETC's frugality comes from its model, not from a campaign: with no campus to heat, no daily commuting and no imposed paper, the essentials are secured by design. Here is exactly what that covers.
- PatronageA patron here funds something very precise: a place, a piece of equipment, or a practitioner's time. Here are the three forms open, what each covers exactly, and what the patron receives in return.
- Institutional calendarAn institutional year follows a fixed frame: admissions, opening, mid-point, assessments, boards. Knowing it tells you when to file an application, when you will be assessed and when your award is issued.
- The institute in figuresEvery number on this page is computed from the deposited catalogue at the moment the site is built. None is typed in by hand, which lets you recount them all for yourself.